-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(x/accounts/defaults/lockup): Clean up some logic #20037
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe updates focus on enhancing the Changes
Recent Review DetailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yml Files selected for processing (1)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
…-sdk into son/lockup_cleanup
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
{ | ||
Amount: sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin("stake", math.NewInt(500))), | ||
Length: time.Minute, | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ensure consistency in test data setup.
Consider using a loop to add multiple periods with the same settings to reduce redundancy and improve maintainability.
- {
- Amount: sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin("stake", math.NewInt(500))),
- Length: time.Minute,
- },
+ for i := 0; i < 3; i++ {
+ periods = append(periods, types.Period{
+ Amount: sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin("stake", math.NewInt(500))),
+ Length: time.Minute,
+ })
+ }
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
{ | |
Amount: sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin("stake", math.NewInt(500))), | |
Length: time.Minute, | |
}, | |
for i := 0; i < 3; i++ { | |
periods = append(periods, types.Period{ | |
Amount: sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin("stake", math.NewInt(500))), | |
Length: time.Minute, | |
}) | |
} |
Description
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Undelegate
methods to streamline lockup account operations.Tests
Documentation
Chores